GPs should make patients aware of multiple treatment options and the potential need for several changes in medication, and actively follow-up with their patients when providing advice or changing treatment due to side effects, such as aches and tiredness, according to the researchers.
Three in 10 stroke survivors will go on to have a further stroke, which causes greater disability or even death. Secondary prevention medications, including anti-hypertensives, blood thinning and lipid lowering agents, such as statins, can reduce risk of stroke recurrence by up to 75 per cent. However, adherence to these medications decreases over time because a minority of people experience side effects, which are mild in most cases.
The analysis, by led by Queen Mary University of London with researchers from Cambridge University was published in the journal Family Practice. The data came from the archives of TalkStroke, a UK online forum hosted by the research charity, the Stroke Association. The forum, used by patients with stroke and their carers, generated 21,596 posts from 2004-2011. In total, 50 participants were found to discuss GP advice on prevention medications in 43 discussion threads.
The side effects of secondary prevention medications, and statins in particular, were found to cause anxiety and resentment in some patients, and their concerns were not always addressed by GPs. While most advice was followed, GP advice was sometimes disregarded when related to dealing with statin side effects. Some patients even stopped the medication after just one or two attempts by the GP to adjust statin treatment.
Lead researcher Anna De Simoni from QMUL said, “I am a GP and these findings have changed my own practice when I start patients on statins and when they consult about side effects.
Given-the variety of cholesterol lowering treatments and possible approaches to manage statin intolerant patients, it is surprising to see to that patients seemingly lost hope after only one or two contacts with their GPs, unaware that a better regimen may have been available or that their GP would have been able to carry out another change in medication.
"In my practice I am now advising patients that multiple treatment options are available, and several attempts may be required before a suitable treatment is found. It is also important to pro-actively invite them to seek help if side effects are experienced and don't improve,” De Simoni said.
The study found that forum participants did not make incorrect or misleading statements, but instead provided appropriate peer support, underlined the central role of GPs in managing medications, and their shared-decision making with clinicians was improved by online peer-to-peer discussions.
Given the ease, low-cost and advantages of obtaining patient information from online fora, the researchers say that more attention could be paid into studying health issues using data from online communities. This could allow collection of data from participants who might not take part in traditional research studies and from a wider geographical location.
‘How do stroke survivors and their carers use practitioners’ advice on secondary prevention medications? Qualitative study of an online forum.’ Nkeonye J Izuka, Matthew A W Alexander, Chantal Balasooriya-Smeekens, Jonathan Mant and Anna De Simoni. Family Practice 2017. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmx023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmx023
Receive the Funding Newswire each Tuesday, our Policy Bulletin each Thursday, and news about bridging Europe’s east-west innovation gap twice a month in The Widening. 
A unique international forum for public research organisations and companies to connect their external engagement with strategic interests around their R&D system.
