Universities wary of potential funding shift for alliances

03 Jul 2025 | News

Moving the European Universities alliances from Erasmus+ to the Competitiveness Fund could undermine long-term support, academic groups say

Photo credits: Nathan Dumlao / Unsplash

A suggestion that funding for European Universities alliances could be moved from the Erasmus+ education programme to the new European Competitiveness Fund (ECF) is causing concern among academic networks. 

Rumours of a change in their funding are circulating ahead of the publication of the next Multiannual Financial Framework on July 16, which will be accompanied by proposals for the ECF and the next Framework Programme for research and innovation. 

The alliances bring together more than 570 higher education institutions in order to develop joint curricula and stimulate mobility for students across the continent. Under Erasmus+ the alliances have been built on voluntary collaboration between universities in areas of mutual interest. The ECF, in contrast, is likely to direct money to specific topics considered of strategic importance by policymakers in Brussels.

“[ECF support] would come with many strings attached and would be more about alliances working for EU policy priorities than their own academic mission,” said Thomas Jørgensen, head of the policy coordination and foresight unit at the European University Association. “And while there is often an overlap, nobody would sign up to be an instrument for shifting priorities coming out of Brussels,” he added.

Kurt Deketelaere, secretary general of the League of European Research Universities, agreed. “It looks quite contradictory that a pure top-down instrument would go and fund a pure bottom-up initiative,” he said.

Another concern is that the ECF’s focus on competitiveness is closely tied to market creation and short-term economic productivity, whereas research and education require long-term investments. 

These “inherently take time and may not yield immediate economic outcomes,” said Silvia Gomez Recio, secretary general of the Young European Research Universities Network. “If European Universities alliances are evaluated through a short-term economic lens, their broader and longer-term contributions risk being overlooked or undervalued.”

In her view, the alliances are already supporting Europe’s competitiveness, only they do this over the long term by building cross-border cooperation, promoting innovation and modernising higher education.


Related articles: 


Ivana Didak, head of higher education policy at the Guild of European Research-Intensive Universities, is also concerned about a possible funding shift. With ECF money, she said, European Universities alliances risk finding themselves “committed to an instrument that fails to meet their need for long-term, stable, and sector-specific support.”

A further concern is that the alliances were created specifically to respond to Erasmus+ calls. “Trying now to shift the initiative under a fundamentally different logic risks undermining their added value and the rationale behind their formation,” said Mattias Björnmalm, secretary general of the CESAER university association.

Potential benefits

A change for the alliances may not be all bad, however. For Kevin Guillaume, secretary general of the Circle U alliance, the ECF has the potential to produce a financing model that could be “more predictable, more structural and above all encompass the three missions of the universities.” That is to say, teaching, research and service to society and the economy.

In particular, he thinks ECF patronage could offer greater support for research collaborations, rather than the educational collaborations and support for young researchers favoured by Erasmus+.

Deketelaere suspects that one motive for the European Commission proposing a change is to help finance research activities carried out at the universities. The other is to reduce the burden on the Erasmus+ budget, some €1.2 billion of which is going to the European Universities initiative over the 2021-27 period. 

Björnmalm also sees potential advantages. The fund’s expected focus on engaging with private actors, starting with industry, could “open an interesting door” for European Universities alliances to contribute, providing that a substantial share of the ECF is directed to this goal. However, he would not want this to become their core activity. 

Never miss an update from Science|Business:   Newsletter sign-up