Legislation is needed to bring ERA to the next level

06 Nov 2013 | Viewpoint
It’s time for an end to the softly-softly approach: new laws are needed to force through the formation of the European Research Area, say MEPs

MEPs Luigi Berlinguer, former Italian science minister, and Amalia Sartori, Chair of the Parliament's research committee, have called on the EU to introduce laws to speed up progress on the single market for research, the European Research Area (ERA). This follows a recent progress report showing that more than a decade after the initiative’s launch, R&D in Europe continues to be underfunded and fragmented, with significant barriers to collaboration.

While the Commission has said it favours a solely political approach to reinvigorating the  creation of ERA, the two MEPs say this softly-softly approach – based on encouraging member states to reform their structures on a voluntary basis – has not worked. The fact that the most prominent obstacles facing research collaboration in Europe have not changed since the initiative began in 2000, shows, “A new ERA framework is needed,” Berlinguer and Sartori say.

In their manifesto, A Maastricht for Research , the two call for new laws, saying, “The most far-sighted and courageous approach should take the form of directives and, in the long run, of a constitutional commitment.” 

When she spoke on the issue to MEPs during the October plenary session of the European Parliament, Máire Geoghegan-Quinn, Commissioner for Research and Innovation, did not rule out the possibility of legislation, saying, “All options are on the table.” Following this, the meeting of European Heads of State in Brussels last week said there is a need to “accelerate structural reforms” and to “strengthen progress monitoring” of the initiative. The EU leaders emphasised the need to improve the mobility and career prospects of researchers, but stopped short of commenting on concrete deadlines or legislative measures.

Whatever the sentiment currently, ERA will have to wait sometime before there is any major overhaul - as the decision on whether or not to enact legislation will fall to the new Commission and Parliament after the elections next year. 

The MEPs’ Maastricht Research manifesto, named after the 1992 treaty which granted freedom of movement of goods, capital, people, and services in Europe, lists five main obstacles that stand in the way of creating the “fifth freedom”— the free circulation of knowledge. 


1. Low levels of investment and human resources

The level of investment in R&D in the EU pales in comparison to our international competitors, says the manifesto. In 2010, investment in Japan rose to 3.39 per cent of GDP, whereas spending in the US remained at 2.68 per cent. By comparison, Europe managed to spend only two per cent. This trend is also confirmed by human capital, with 2007 figures showing that over 40 per cent of the world’s researchers are based in Asia, compared to 28 per cent in Europe.

2. Fragmentation and lack of co-ordination

Unlike its competitors – the US, Japan, Brazil, China – research policy in Europe is coordinated not by one single centre, but by 28 national centres and the European Commission. “The complexity of too many financial schemes, conflicting systems, and administrative burdens weakens and sometimes prevents the process of development and circulation of knowledge in Europe,” say Berlinguer and Sartori. 

Reinforcing their recommendation for legal action, the MEPs cite a “lack of a long-term political commitment” as the major difficulty facing transnationally coordinated research. 

3. Knowledge application

The manifesto highlights the importance of adopting a strategic approach for the sharing of research outputs, especially at a time where public funding for R&D increasingly needs to be justified. 

To this end, cooperation between universities, public research organisations and industry is essential. Public-private partnerships, “the engine for an innovative and socially cohesive society,” should be developed and increased, the MEPs suggest.

4. Research infrastructures

Europe needs to develop a better synergy between national and EU public research funds, as well as structural funds, in order to ensure optimal operation and exploitation of existing structures and to develop new, sustainable pan-European infrastructures. Strategic research infrastructures will serve European researchers and attract the best international researchers.

5. Research careers and mobility

Full freedom of movement for researchers is the cornerstone of the ERA, yet many obstacles stand in its way. Greater “portability of national grants, coordinated systems of social security, transparent publication of competitions, implementation of the Charter and Code of Conduct for researchers”, would enable the next generation of researchers to enjoy true freedom of movement, say Berlinguer and Sartori.

The manifesto supports the widespread adoption of transnational doctoral programmes, such as the Marie Skodowska-Curie Actions, with the aim of creating “a new generation of European researchers.” Such programmes should place a particular focus on interdisciplinary and industrial doctoral programmes, which incentivise stable and balanced relations between academia and industry, and endow researchers with relevant skill-sets. 

Never miss an update from Science|Business:   Newsletter sign-up