Sweden: Study indicates patients are prescribed potentially futile drugs at end of life

Writing in The American Journal of Medicine, the authors call for clinical guidelines to support physicians in deciding whether to continue or discontinue medications near the end of life.

The simultaneous use of multiple medications has become commonplace among older adults. In high-income countries, it has previously been estimated that 25 per cent to 40 per cent of people aged 65 years or older are prescribed at least five medications. This can lead to drug-drug interactions and serious adverse effects.

In the context of end-of-life care, it raises ethical questions about the potential futility of treatments close to death.

“People with life-limiting illness often receive medications whose benefit is unlikely to be achieved within their remaining lifespan,” writes lead author Lucas Morin, of the Aging Research Center at Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, Sweden.

“However, previous studies have been conducted in selected samples of individuals. Future research and clinical guidelines need to be informed by findings that are generalizable beyond a specific illness or care setting.”

The authors identified over half a million adults over 65 years of age who died in Sweden between 2007 and 2013, and reconstructed their drug prescription history for each of the last 12 months of life through the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. The characteristics of study participants at time of death were assessed through record linkage with the National Patient Register, the Social Services Register, and the Swedish Education Register. Over-the-counter drugs were not taken into account.

The study had two main findings:

First, the burden of medications increases as death approaches. The proportion of older adults exposed to at least ten different prescription drugs rose from 30 per cent to 47 per cent over the course of the last year before death.

Older adults who died from cancer had the largest increase in the number of drugs. Individuals living in care homes were found to receive a greater number of medications than those living in the community, but the number of drugs increased more slowly for those living in an institution.

Second, the researchers found that polypharmacy near the end of life is fuelled not only by drugs prescribed for the purpose of symptom management (for example, analgesics), but also by the frequent continuation of long-term preventive treatments and disease-targeted drugs. For instance, during their last month of life, a large proportion of older adults used platelet anti-coagulants (45 per cent), beta-blockers (41 per cent), ACE inhibitors (21 per cent), vasodilators (17 per cent), statins (16 per cent), calcium channel blockers (15 per cent), or potassium-sparing agents (12 per cent).

“The clinical benefit of drugs aiming at preventing cardiovascular diseases during the final month of life is at the very least questionable. Physicians should consider discontinuing drugs that may be effective and otherwise appropriate, but whose potential harms outweigh the benefits that patients can reasonably expect before death occurs.”

However, the authors note, “The process of de-prescribing requires timely dialogue between the patient, family, and physician, and close monitoring of symptoms. It is also essential that patients and their relatives receive clear information about their options in terms of palliative care in order to counter the feeling of abandonment that they may experience when treatments are withdrawn.”

‘Choosing Wisely? Measuring the Burden of Medications in Older Adults near the End of Life: Nationwide, Longitudinal Cohort Study.’

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.02.028